D-CAT Group ↗ Product vision Help Center Contact ENTRDEESAZ
Start a 4-week pilot

Research paper · 2026 · 19 pages

The Science Analytics Never Shipped

An AI agent can generate findings continuously, at a cost approaching zero. The person receiving them has the same working memory they had in 1984 — the last year a finding from cognitive science made it into an analytics product. This paper is about the research that piled up in between.

It is written by someone who spent twenty-five years building the analytics defaults it argues against.

What is inside

Section by section

  • The gap that is not ignorance — why one 1984 result became every BI default and the rest stayed in the literature
  • The capacity that does not scale — working memory, cognitive load, and the arithmetic of forty findings
  • The obvious fix, and what the data did to it — what explanations actually buy
  • What works, and what it costs — cognitive forcing and the satisfaction trade-off
  • The variable underneath — verification cost, and how to make it a number
  • Where attention goes — surprise, bad news, the information gap
  • The single-format assumption — the hospital dashboard we would no longer defend
  • The cost of telling a story — narrative transportation and the reader’s guard
  • The management implication — four questions that rarely appear on a procurement checklist
  • A note on method — where AI was used, and what three verification passes found
“Some of what we have been calling a culture problem is a design problem wearing a culture problem’s clothes.”

— from Why I wrote this

Ali Yıldırım — Founder and CEO, D-CAT Group. Twenty-five years in enterprise business intelligence. Computer Engineering, Boğaziçi University; MBA, Istanbul Bilgi University.

Ten sections, twenty sources, one argument: the defaults were set before most of the research arrived. Each source is listed with what it actually found — including the ones that cut against the argument here.

See the checks hold on your own data

Four weeks on your warehouse, with the acceptance criteria written before week one. Or start smaller: a free data discovery study tells you which signals your semantic model carries today.